I picked up a 50ct. box of one hundred sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I'm hesitant to burn off the powder and projectiles on workup when all I've is 50 bullets. But I really want to locate a bullet within the 160 class that my more mature rifle likes.
They are the identical factor, but H4831 sc is Lower shorter so it will eventually pack into a case less difficult then the conventional, and in some cases like our 7mm rem mag it permits us to include additional powder then just the traditional H4831.
Liberalism; The impossible still acknowledged Idea that it is solely feasible to select up a turd through the clean up conclude.
Meaning the knowledgable handloader can, with some extrapolation, locate a starting load when only one is mentioned for a specific cartridge.
My working experience would be that the SC and SSC loaded to the same excess weight because the extended Slash reveals a decreased velocity.
Liberalism; The extremely hard nonetheless acknowledged Idea that it is totally doable to select up a turd through the cleanse close.
Nampa, Idaho In my encounter the sole serious big difference would be that the shortcut meters much better by reloading gear. The moment It is loaded theres no useful difference. I've listened to which the shortcut could possibly have a tiny bit speedier burn charge but It appears insignificant.
excaliber claimed: I've uncovered the exact opposite being correct in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and equally precise powder in my 300 Earn Mag.
At the moment h4831sc load data employing IMR 4831 within a 300WSM, and find out the H4831sc is a popular choice for this caliber and yields a little bit more velocity. Aside from it being shorter Slice, what exactly is the primary difference in these two powders, and may I switch to H4831sc?
The 55grs is all of that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I feel that they've got slowed down the swift to show that their rifles are better. It bug the hell out of me. I realize far better. That is why I don't ever throw out my more mature manuals. I do order new handbook continuously to remain up on new chambers and there loading. I exploit this 39grs in summers @ one hundred+ degrees without any issues.
I've had comparable practical experience with H4350. For me, some ball powders will not likely shoot perfectly with anything at all other than Fed215's. Some factors just Never Enjoy well with other. Looks like you have preferred three great powders, I might hope a minimum of one h4831 vs h4831sc of them to shoot.
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Have a very minimal offer of Varget, and also a large amount more accessible H4831SC. I shoot 55 gr. loads almost exclusively, because that's what the rifles shoot the best.
Both of those have the Identical burn off amount, short Reduce comes in useful For anyone who is at max fill instead of at tension/velocity that you want you will get far more shortcut in a very circumstance.
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but have a h4831sc load data restricted provide of Varget, plus a ton more accessible H4831SC. I shoot 55 gr. loads Nearly exclusively, simply because which is exactly what the rifles shoot the top.